Reports of "Character Building" Market—Significant Parallels with High Tech Bust—Plus, the Emerging Web 2.0 Vein

The sub-prime induced correction of the U.S. financial sector has changed the context around M&A during the last year, and mergers and acquisitions experts met last week to share success stories, lessons learned and admonitions at the Alliance of Mergers & Acquisition Advisors Summer Conference July 22-25, 2008 at Chicago's Wyndham Hotel. I was asked to present a new talk, "Leveraging a Web 2.0 Ecosystem to Grow Your Business," and I had the opportunity to attend some of the other sessions. I'll summarize their key points before adding some thoughts on the promise that Web 2.0 and social networks bring to deal marketing due to significantly decreased transaction costs.

AM&AA members hail from all parts of a rich ecosystem of investment bankers, attorneys, private equity, brokers, intermediaries, CPAs and others who specialize in every aspect of architecting, researching, negotiating and executing deals. To make money consistently in M&A, one needs to know how to identify and manage a wide range of risks. The financial system's painful correction is changing many of the metrics around M&A, but those who can adjust their strategies can do quite well. It's necessary to accept the new conditions and to play by them.

Leveraging B2C "Social" Networks for Real Enterprise Advantage—Flashbacks to Web 1.0—People in Bars

Pan in, circa 1998, and enterprises were beginning to doubt the conventional wisdom that had prevailed during the past three years, namely that "the Internet" was a Silicon Valley fad that would blow over with nary a whimper. It was "for kids," it didn't merit adult attention—none of these "businesses" were making money anyway. You can't be serious, how could a money-losing online bookstore affect GM? It looks silly to read these words today, but that's only because we know what happened. Here I will suggest that we are on the cusp of a similar shift with Web 2.0 and social networks, I'll outline an approach you can use to consider your adoption strategy, and I will recommend tactical things you can do right now to leverage LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Del.icio.us and others.

Since 2006, my consulting work has encompassed strategic and tactical sides of Web 2.0 and social networks and, in 2008, I launched a tactically-focused service, the Executive's Guide to LinkedIn, which helps global enterprises to use LinkedIn for process innovation. This has provided the opportunity to deep dive into applying these tools to enterprise processes.

Just Released—CSRA Market Advisory Highlights How I-Banks are Using Web 2.0 to Drive Competitiveness

This summer, "Enterprise 2.0" began to get legs as the new moniker for applying Web 2.0 to the enterprise, reflecting that pragmatists are raising their eyes for an exploratory glance. The market advisory shares how global investment banks are using Enterprise 2.0, and it suggests action steps for executives to take this year and next. Here is the executive summary and a few choice concluding points:

Pervasive Consumer Connectivity Vision Upstaged by Enterprise Web 2.0 Collaboration

Cisco's John Chambers is a master technology marketer who quickens your pulse with technology fire and brimstone. However, as the long-time CEO of Cisco, which epitomized the rise of the (Silicon) Valley when it was briefly the most valuable company in the U.S. in 2000, he has seen the company through the tech bust and proven that he has substance and staying power. Although a hypemeister extraordinaire, he may have crystallized the promise of the Enterprise Web 2.0 better than any other speaker at Digital Hollywood Chicago.

Chambers' demos of whiz-bang consumer entertainment scenarios were intriguing but far less interesting to an enterprise-focused audience than his accounts of how Cisco had drastically increased its already-leading efficiency in mergers and acquisitions by collaborating with Web 2.0 tools like wikis. We anticipate that his consumer-focused vision will be consummated far in the future, but his message about enterprise collaboration is achievable this year—for those who are looking for it.

Chambers described an emerging future of networks and communication that revolved around pervasive video, which will drive customer experience, collaboration and value. The world is entering a fundamentally new era in which communication is morphing from one-to-many to many-to-many. This will drive a new degree of collaboration and innovation, and it will change business models. Telecoms are not "coming back," and there will be significant consolidation. Video will rise to prominence and will be created and experienced on any machine or device.

Redefining the Industry to Remain Relevant—The Significance of AT&T's Big Bet on Mobile

At Digital Hollywood Chicago, AT&T was busy redefining itself as a 21st century communications provider, and we believe that will increasingly mean focusing on content to provide profits. An AT&T veteran but new in 2007 as CEO, Randall Stephenson keynoted the conference by sharing his vision for AT&T and the future of the industry.

Telecoms provide the network infrastructure of distributed computing and global communications, but infrastructure is a tough business with thin margins and high capital requirements. All telecoms are trying to move up the value chain to escape commoditization pressure and relentless price competition. For example, Sprint is betting heavily on WiMAX to redefine itself as the enabler of digital relationships.

In the context of telecoms redefinition, AT&T's alliance with Apple could be very strategic for each company, as AT&T can use Apple's design excellence to increase subscribers and push advanced network services while Apple needs a telecom partner to drive its relevance in the growing third screen market with the iPhone. According to Stephenson, the industry must ask itself, "What is a communications company?" to take advantage of consumer empowerment (although he didn't call it that). As usual, we will outline his comments before turning to our analysis and conclusions.

Why Apple Could Emerge as a Three-Screen Player Par Excellence

Apple's name change in early 2007 was heralded as the company's redefinition as a consumer products company. The conventional wisdom held that the lion's share of the run-up of Apple's stock price had been due to the excitement of the iPod and the successful rekindling interest in the company's Macintosh computers. Moreover, Apple's stock had limited headroom because consumer electronics heavies were getting into the market for music players, and this would leech profits. The iPhone looked great, but it was overpriced in a hyper-competitive market; it wouldn't penetrate much beyond a few gadget freaks.

This prevailing view works great for Apple because it keeps people focused on the wrong things—literally. Apple's business strategy is far more profound. It goes far beyond the SIC, hardware or even software. It is an experience strategy based on content and communications.

The Innovation Imperative: A Play in Two Acts, Starring the Consumer

Irene B. Rosenfeld, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Kraft Foods, outlined her vision for relaunching Kraft at the Executives' Club of Chicago's Chicago CEO Breakfast on May 30, 2007 at the Mid-America Club. She was enthusiastic about the company's second lease on life: having spun off of Altria this spring, the company is newly independent, and she was eager to share her plan to drive growth by addressing the "eye of the consumer."

Kraft Foods is the second largest food company in the world and the largest in North America. It has seven brands that produce revenue of over $1 billion and fifty that bring in over $100 million each. Central to her strategy is leveraging Kraft's formidable brand portfolio and other economies of scale. Rosenfeld "came home to Kraft" about a year ago, having had highly visible leadership roles at the company in the past and the top job at Frito-Lay immediately prior.

From our perspective, Kraft is exhibiting post-Industrial Economy malaise, which afflicts product-focused companies that are trapped in legacy production and distribution paradigms. The classic symptom is chronic product commoditization and lackluster growth. However, Kraft is doing the right thing by focusing on innovation. After our summary of Rosenfeld's remarks, we will discuss the CPG predicament and offer some ideas for transitioning to the Knowledge Economy through customer-led innovation.

IBM's CEO Articulates Prescient Vision for the Enterprise—Adapting to the Knowledge Economy

Samuel J. Palmisano, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of IBM Corporation, outlined a new version of the enterprise at a lunch honoring him with the Executives' Club of Chicago's Thirteenth Annual International Executive of the Year Award April 12, 2007 at the Chicago Hilton. Entitled “Leadership, Trust and the Globally Integrated Enterprise,” his speech emphasized key points from his Summer 2006 article of the same name in Foreign Affairs. He was especially interesting to hear due to his experience with leading one of the world's foremost global enterprises as well as his insight from serving global enterprises in every industry.

Yesterday's model for the global enterprise, the multinational corporation (MNC), looks increasingly outdated due to widespread adoption of standards-based technology, increasingly standardized work processes and a liberalizing regulatory environment. Today, knowledge-based resources are available globally, and the enterprise's means to create value is choosing how and where to tap the resources to best execute business processes. Moreover, the shift to the globally integrated enterprise means a profound culture shift and outlook, which we will address here.

In addition, although Palmisano didn't reference IBM's visionary Component Business Modeling (CBM) in either his presentation or article, I clearly heard it in the background. Transitioning to the globally integrated enterprise model requires a completely new way of thinking about business structures and operations. I will illustrate this through brief comments about Component Business Modeling as well as Transourcing, an approach I developed in 2006.

How Sprint Nextel is Betting Its Future on a New Wired Society

Gary D. Forsee, Chairman and CEO, Sprint Nextel Corporation, set the stage for the Executives' Club of Chicago's Technology Conference by outlining Sprint's wireless strategy and a new vision for global community at the March enterprise CEO luncheon at the Chicago Hilton.

Sprint's long history reflects the transformation of the U.S. telecoms market. The company has had a key role in remaking the U.S. telecoms industry during its privatization. It competed as a competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) and once earned most of its revenue from long distance services, which are now essentially free. After its 2005 merger with Nextel, virtually all its revenue comes from wireless services.

Moreover, Mr. Forsee promised that Chicago would be one of two pilot cities for Sprint's WiMAX initiative later this year. Chicagoans will be among the first in the U.S. to try 4G network services.